petition to Your Excellency" that I know the eleven Chinese prisoners, (whose extradition has been demanded by the Chinese Government) to be innocent, and that they have not made their defence."-
will allow
Before substantiating my statement to that effect, Your Excellency will allow me to clearly state, that it was not my intention at all to blame in any way the sentence given by the Magistrate in the case, as I entertained and entertain the greatest respect for his judgment and I think I have clearly stated in my petition that a prima facie evidence could have been ascertained but that it was not a sufficient proof of their being guilty as many who have been rightly committed by the Magistrate to the Supreme Court on a prima facie evidence have been found not guilty when their case was fully heard at the Supreme Court. On that meaning also I understood when I said that their case was not heard, as I was quite persuaded that full opportunity had been given to the prisoner's lawyer to make their defence.
Having stated that I proceed to substantiate my statement with regard to the men being innocent.
My statements are based 1. in the informations given three years ago by my Missionaries who live in the Mainland. 2. in the informations which I ordered to be taken from the
petition to Your Excellency" that I know the eleven Chinese prisoners, (whose extradition has been demauded by the Chinese Government ) tobe innocent, and that they have not made their defence."-
will allow
Before substantiating my statement to that effect, Your Excellency me to clearly state, that it was not my
by writing the petition
intention at all
to blame in.
any way
the sentence
given by the Magistrate in the case,
as d'entertained and entertain the~
greatest respect for his judgment and I think I have clearly stated in my petition that a prima facic evidence
could have been ascertained but that
The
was not a sufficient proof of the
Aten
being
h
being guilty as great many
who have
339
been rightly committed by the Magistrate to the Supreme Court on a prima facie evidence have been found not guilty when
their case was
fully heard at the Supreme
Court on that meaning also Funderstood
ARA
to write when I said that their case 174 not heard, as I was quite persuaded-
that full opportunity had been given to the prisoners lawyer to make their defence.
Having stated that I proved to substantiate my statement with regard
being innouent.
to the men
My
statements are based 1. in the informations given three years ago by me of my Missionaries who lives in the Mainland. 2. in the informations which I ordered to be taken from the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.